View Single Post
Old 2007-06-03, 04:23   #16 (permalink)
xemumanic
Portal Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: East Strondsburg PA
Posts: 94
Thanks: 9
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Country:

My System

Send a message via ICQ to xemumanic Send a message via MSN to xemumanic
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Somperson View Post
Obivously everyone would love these ATI/Nvidia cards to do 95% of the decoding. But everyone should know that these companies have bad track records with offloading the cpu.

Some notes.. please correct me if I am wrong:

Purevideo nvidia drivers require Vista at the moment and will not accelerate under XP.

I hear getting x.264 to decode properly with mkv files are an issue right now. I think its the splitter??

PowerDVD v7.3 takes advantage of the PureVideo HD H.264 decoding in _both_ XP and Vista, even in .mkv, or whatever else uses x.264/H.264/AVC encoding, with no artifacting or anything. No matter what you hear, CoreAVC looks just fine, and FFDshow works fine, but is slow. I used to use CoreAVC until I got PowerDVD v7.3, and now I just use the Cyberlink decoders.

The big thing about the newer Nvidia 8500/8600 cards is that their newer Video Processors (often referred to as VP2), decode so well, that they do most of the work of decoding, and don't require a high end CPU. Only the midrange 85/86 GeForce 8 cards have this new VP2, not the 8800. It has the older VP, which isn't as effective.

Last edited by xemumanic; 2007-06-03 at 05:54.
xemumanic is offline   Reply With Quote