MediaPortal Forums HTPC/MediaCenter

Go Back   MediaPortal Forum » MediaPortal Tools » DeployTool (Installer for MediaPortal 1.0)


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2008-04-20, 12:49   #11 (permalink)
Project Coordinator
 
infinityloop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Age: 28
Posts: 5,946
Thanks: 151
Thanked 112 Times in 78 Posts

Country:

My System

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by backslash View Post
In my opinion the best thing would be to abandon the old tv engine because it was never a joy to use. Less options means lesser confusion. Simple like that.
has been discussed, but i got outvoted.
__________________
regards
chris

MediaPortal Project Coordinator
Test Team Leader

Do not start to moan if something is not working as you want it to be.
Remember that MediaPortal is Open Source.
YOU can improve it!
infinityloop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-05-01, 17:33   #12 (permalink)
MP Donator
 
level20peon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Aachen
Age: 26
Posts: 990
Thanks: 14
Thanked 38 Times in 34 Posts

Country:

My System

Send a message via ICQ to level20peon
Default

You could simply add (installs TV-Server) in brackets behind the "HD...". It wouldn't add too much text and would suit beginners as well as advanced users.
I had to use the installer twice to get the setup I wanted. This means an advanced user doesn't get a "single click" setup but just a beginner who doesn't know what he is doing exactly ^^ ?


-level20peon
level20peon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-05-01, 18:22   #13 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Paranoid Delusion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 5,883
Thanks: 103
Thanked 178 Times in 160 Posts

Country:

My System

Default

Hi

Problem with that is everytime TVServer mentioned, people think they don't need a server\client setup or just consider it too complicated.
The fact its no more complicated to setup than the internal TV, and as far as the end user is concerned just as easy to use, but with more features.

If someone had said to me a few years ago about this kind of setup, i'd have had a blank look on my face as i bet many of our newcomers have as well.

Regards
Paranoid Delusion is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-05-02, 09:29   #14 (permalink)
MP Donator
 
level20peon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Aachen
Age: 26
Posts: 990
Thanks: 14
Thanked 38 Times in 34 Posts

Country:

My System

Send a message via ICQ to level20peon
Default

Then add (installs TVE3) in brackets, people won't be concerned about the word "server" then and "insiders" would know what they are dealing with


-level20peon
level20peon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-05-02, 12:35   #15 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
funkstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 357
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

Country:


Default

TVEngine 3 and TVE3 names have been dropped as it was too confusing. There were too many names for the same thing.
funkstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-05-04, 08:38   #16 (permalink)
MP Donator
 
level20peon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Aachen
Age: 26
Posts: 990
Thanks: 14
Thanked 38 Times in 34 Posts

Country:

My System

Send a message via ICQ to level20peon
Default

Well to have too many names for the same technology is one thing. But not having any name at all is just as confusing (at least to me).
Else it is like "Are you using the integrated TV-Engine or, you know, the other one, which name shall not be mentioned?"


-level20peon

Last edited by level20peon; 2008-05-04 at 08:59.
level20peon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-05-13, 11:06   #17 (permalink)
pbb
Docs Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Trondheim
Age: 36
Posts: 296
Thanks: 5
Thanked 20 Times in 9 Posts

Country:

My System

Send a message via ICQ to pbb Send a message via MSN to pbb Send a message via Yahoo to pbb
Default

Hi all,

I have to agree, the question "Do you want to watch HDTV" is not good.

Edit: I've reworked my reply, because I wasn't making much sense myself either...

My comments on the HDTV question:

1. Dubious wording

The question is: "Do you want to watch HDTV." Now if you really need to know, yes I want to watch HDTV. I can't, because I don't have a HDTV receiver, but yes I would really want to. Just like I want to use a big-ass 60" OLED 3-D TV

This same mistake has been made on several of the installer questions.

2. Mixing up terminology

The question is about HDTV, but the answer is about HD content! If I am not mistaken, HD content is any video source with a resolution of 720x1280 or higher, this could also be downloaded video files. This is actually the point that made me come to the forums for explanation; do I need to answer "yes" if I want to play high-res video files? Apparently not, but this is what the answers suggest.

3. What the end-user knows

Now this one is tricky, because I can't call myself an unknowing end-user anymore, and neither can most of the MP users.

But if I am right, most consumers will associate HDTV (and the HDTV logo, that is also shown on the installer page) with TV sets, not with reception technology. They can use their "High Definition Television set" (HDTV) to watch analogue broadcasts and DVD's. Will they be wrong saying "Yes, I have an HDTV"?

If I go by the commercials that are being shown on the TV here all the time, your average end-user will have a better (and correct) understanding of digital versus analogue then HDTV versus SDTV. But that may of course be different per country.

4. Wrong terminology

Which brings me up to the next point; shouldn't the question actually be about digital versus analogue instead of HDTV? If I am using a digital receiver, but most channels still only broadcast SDTV, what should I choose? (I may be totally off here, since I don't have a digital receiver myself...)

5. Wrong target audience

Let's go back to the answer options. Say we are dealing with people who don't even know what high definition is. These must be really clueless, but I agree they may be out there. No problem, there is an answer option "I don't know what HD content is."

Great, is that the option for them? No, it is not! Because after they answer they don't know about HD, they actually get an even more technical question about which TV engine to use. This is definitely not the type of question the people that are lead here can answer... I understand the need to have access to this question, but it should not be hidden behind the "I don't know what HD is" question...

6. The Wrong Question

This is what it is all about; the question is just basically wrong! Either way, if we ask about HDTV or digital TV, I would have to answer "no" to this question. But if I want to make use of the client/server-technology, I will have to lie by saying I will be watching HDTV, or lie and say I don't know what HD is.

An alternative approach

How about this:

Q: Do you want to use the build-in TV engine, or the newer TV server?
A1: TV server
A2: Build-in TV engine
A3: I don't know

If A3, then:
Q: Do you receive digital or analogue television?
A1: Digital
A2: Analogue
A3: I don't know

If again A3, install and use the classic engine.

Last edited by pbb; 2008-05-13 at 12:15.
pbb is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
hdoption

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Protected by Akismet Blog with WordPress