MediaPortal Forums HTPC/MediaCenter

Go Back   MediaPortal Forum » MediaPortal 1 » MediaPortal 1 Talk


MediaPortal 1 Talk General talk regarding our HTPC-software MediaPortal 1 takes place here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2005-08-18, 22:08   #1 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default Can MP work as Server and Client?

Just that!

I currently use SageTV working in a clint server manner. Is this possible with MP even with live TV etc.

This is one of those 'must have' features for MP to have for me to even consider using it in my home as I have a main server in the lounge and a client PC in the bedroom.

MVP support would also be good so that I can port it to my second bedroom.

Sage currently has a 3rd party bit of software that allows the MVP to work EXACTLY as a SageTV client. Is this kind of thing available with MP?
__________________
P4 3ghz 'Prescott' HT On, SilverstoneLC03 Case, 1Gb Ram, 160gb System, Galaxy nVIDIA 6800GT 256mb (driver77.76), 2xPVR250, XPproSP2, DX9c (quartz.dll replaced), NVdvd 'PureVideo' 1.02-150, VMR9.
ukmgranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-18, 22:12   #2 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Smirnuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

My System

Default

Currently no, in the future... definately.
Smirnuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-18, 22:45   #3 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default

Bummer!

May as well stop tinkerring then.
__________________
P4 3ghz 'Prescott' HT On, SilverstoneLC03 Case, 1Gb Ram, 160gb System, Galaxy nVIDIA 6800GT 256mb (driver77.76), 2xPVR250, XPproSP2, DX9c (quartz.dll replaced), NVdvd 'PureVideo' 1.02-150, VMR9.
ukmgranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-19, 10:07   #4 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smirnoff
Currently no, in the future... definately.
When you say that, do you mean in the near future (as in you know of some development) or maybe (as in nig company talk AKA - it will never happen):cry:?
__________________
P4 3ghz 'Prescott' HT On, SilverstoneLC03 Case, 1Gb Ram, 160gb System, Galaxy nVIDIA 6800GT 256mb (driver77.76), 2xPVR250, XPproSP2, DX9c (quartz.dll replaced), NVdvd 'PureVideo' 1.02-150, VMR9.
ukmgranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-19, 10:19   #5 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Smirnuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post

My System

Default

I'm confident that it will happen but there is no ETA, key thing at the moment is to improve upon the stability of what we already have before moving on to the next level.

As an after thought... I'm have no idea how much support would be offered to devices like an MVP, my comments and thoughts are focused on PC to PC configurations.
Smirnuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-19, 10:34   #6 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Norway
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default

I've been toying with this idea for a while, and it's is a major undertaking.
I too am interested in PC to PC.

This is how I see it:
First of all the recording engine and streaming has to be made seperate services, so that they can run indivdualy and even on different machines.

Then I think it would be good to have a "broker" service that the server(s) and clients talked to.
ommunication between servers/services and clients could be done with Remoting.

This is only my first crude thought on the subject.

And it is a massive job to do, and makes for a lot of changes in MP.
It's been awhile since I've studdied the code, so I don't remember how strict it's been coded regadring layering and abstraction.

This is something I'd love to get involved in when the time is right...

I agree that stability is of great importance at the moment...

//Morten
__________________
P4 3,2GHz, 1GB RAM, ASUS P5P800 MB, PVR 350, 2 x 250GB S-ATA WD HDD, SigmaDesign XCard, Gainward GeForce FX5500 256MB
Morten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-08-19, 10:45   #7 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default

Sage TV essentially runs as a service and a UI. I think that this is the best element of Sage!

It means that once the server is running (which is just incredibly stable) it just runs in the background and does all of the recording of shows etc. This allows you to play with the UI section of the program (ie change decoder setting etc.) without fear that the whole program will crash. If the UI does crash, the service remains running in the background.

This also means that you can have just the service running on your main machine, and your client machine can just 'log-on' to it, as it were.

I don't actually know anything about coding or programming structure, which is probably abviouse from the description I have just given. I can only imagine though that turning MP to this sort of setup would be a huge undertaking.

I do think that in terms of stability this is the way forward. And it allows for server/clients
__________________
P4 3ghz 'Prescott' HT On, SilverstoneLC03 Case, 1Gb Ram, 160gb System, Galaxy nVIDIA 6800GT 256mb (driver77.76), 2xPVR250, XPproSP2, DX9c (quartz.dll replaced), NVdvd 'PureVideo' 1.02-150, VMR9.
ukmgranger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-09-17, 23:27   #8 (permalink)
Anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a


Default

I don't know much about programming, but it seems to me that making the change to a client/server platform would be better to do it now rather than after you get the current system stable. If it is going to require such massive changes, wouldn't getting the current code stable just be a waste of time if a lot of that code is going to have to be re-worked anyway?
  Reply With Quote
Old 2005-09-18, 04:50   #9 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 318
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default

Getting playback/TV stability is the priority at the moment ...and as its in a transitional stage atm...it needs to be completed before any server/client is really attempted

in short....MP will not see a server/client structure for some time
__________________
My HTPC : * Zalman HD135 HTPC Case (Black), Core2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4 Ghz, 8600GT 512MB Silent, 2GB Corsair DDR2 1066Mhz RAM, Pioneer BDC-S02 (Blu-Ray reader, DVD-Burner), FireDTV DVB-T * MY CODECS - http://forum.team-mediaportal.com/sh...3&postcount=17
SiLenTYL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-09-26, 18:19   #10 (permalink)
Portal Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


Default

One thing i was thinking about, though i don't have the skills to actually do anything about, was whether it would be possible to write a networked BDA driver, this would allow you to use remote TV tuners without changing how the app works.
Basically you would write a bda driver that media portal would use, but instead of talking directly to a local TV tuner, it would talk via the network to another process on the remote tuner pc, which would then talk to the real BDA driver for whatever tuner you were using. This would work not only with mediaportal but with anything that supported BDA.

something like this
currently: MP-->BDA--->Hardware

MP -> BDA_Client_proxy <------ network-------->BDA_Server-->BDA-->Hardware

This doesn't do quite what you want, but does provide some of the things that Sage can do, with network tuners etc, this allows you to have a very thin pc client running MP, but with all the tuners and things hidden in a server somewhere else.
RD
RedDom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
client, server

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TV Server crash when Recorded TV it’s opened from a client comp ronilse fixed TV-Server / Client Bugs 8 2006-11-15 23:32
NO TV on client Machine But OK on Server! yogiman_uk Get Support 11 2006-10-28 21:22
BUG: FTP shares do not work with Filezilla Server 0.9.19 Beta idioteque 0.2.0.0 Final and SVN Builds 1 2006-10-22 22:21
BUG: FTP shares do not work with Filezilla Server 0.9.19 Beta idioteque MediaPortal 1 Talk 0 2006-10-11 20:33
Question about client server model sambuddy General Support 2 2006-06-24 09:43


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0 Protected by Akismet Blog with WordPress
Advertisement System V2.6 By   Branden