Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="phunqe" data-source="post: 282554" data-attributes="member: 50050">I appreciate that you share your inside views of the project. As you said, as an outsider you can only base your opinions on your own experiences with other projects (which can be in a completely different state). While I've worked with projects who needed one certain approach it's not per default applicable here. I can only base my opinions on what I see (then maybe I might be ignorant on certain parts, but then it's just me looking stupid <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />).For example, since I don't use the TV server much, MP was very much usable for me one year ago and I could have sticked with that version while MPII was being developed. TV did work, but clearly not as well as required for it to be let go. Of course, a MPII version wouldn't have been bug free by now, that is unrealistic. It just seemed that MPII could have come vary far, if not where MPI is now or even further by focusing the efforts there. You are right however in the fact that the current userbase needs to be catered to. Doing both is sometimes not a luxury you can afford due to resources.It's easier to try to be wise in retrospective however, what have been decided has been decided and what's important now is to try making MPII a kick ass product.Cheers.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="phunqe, post: 282554, member: 50050"] I appreciate that you share your inside views of the project. As you said, as an outsider you can only base your opinions on your own experiences with other projects (which can be in a completely different state). While I've worked with projects who needed one certain approach it's not per default applicable here. I can only base my opinions on what I see (then maybe I might be ignorant on certain parts, but then it's just me looking stupid :P). For example, since I don't use the TV server much, MP was very much usable for me one year ago and I could have sticked with that version while MPII was being developed. TV did work, but clearly not as well as required for it to be let go. Of course, a MPII version wouldn't have been bug free by now, that is unrealistic. It just seemed that MPII could have come vary far, if not where MPI is now or even further by focusing the efforts there. You are right however in the fact that the current userbase needs to be catered to. Doing both is sometimes not a luxury you can afford due to resources. It's easier to try to be wise in retrospective however, what have been decided has been decided and what's important now is to try making MPII a kick ass product. Cheers. [/QUOTE]

Verification