home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
A Dream: MediaPortal & XBMC combining forces together...
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eabin" data-source="post: 282652" data-attributes="member: 24932"><p>one thing about MPII development is often overlooked: it is a wise thing to focus on a stable, extensible core first, to have a solid basis to build on. working on bling features concurrently leads to hacks and bad code most of the time, because the feature development will experience stalls, and developers don't like to wait. also, there is only a limited number of people who should (and can) work on core components without getting in the way of each other. </p><p></p><p>so i too think it is a good idea to make MPI as stable as possible without rewriting it, to make the waiting for MPII more easy. and a quality product attracts more users for the next release. more users --> more developers --> better product --> repeat.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eabin, post: 282652, member: 24932"] one thing about MPII development is often overlooked: it is a wise thing to focus on a stable, extensible core first, to have a solid basis to build on. working on bling features concurrently leads to hacks and bad code most of the time, because the feature development will experience stalls, and developers don't like to wait. also, there is only a limited number of people who should (and can) work on core components without getting in the way of each other. so i too think it is a good idea to make MPI as stable as possible without rewriting it, to make the waiting for MPII more easy. and a quality product attracts more users for the next release. more users --> more developers --> better product --> repeat. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
A Dream: MediaPortal & XBMC combining forces together...
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom