home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
Anomolous GetActionDetail(...) Behaviour
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kaburke" data-source="post: 11780" data-attributes="member: 11818"><p>I am developing a plugin to use the LiveDrive! IR (and Audigy Drive IR et al) as a remote control receiver. During the implementation, I had occasion to use:</p><p>[code]ActionTranslator.GetAction(...)[/code]</p><p>and</p><p>[code]ActionTranslator.GetActionDetail(...)[/code]</p><p>GetAction(...) did precisely what I wanted, populating the given ref Action with all of the data; however, while the source seems to indicate that GetActionDetail(...) should do the same thing (only using the ActionType as reference instead of the Key), the action passed to this method is not a ref, and so is not modified.</p><p></p><p>And so my question: is the current behaviour of GetActionDetail(...) desired, or is it a bug (meaning should the Action be passed by ref)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kaburke, post: 11780, member: 11818"] I am developing a plugin to use the LiveDrive! IR (and Audigy Drive IR et al) as a remote control receiver. During the implementation, I had occasion to use: [code]ActionTranslator.GetAction(...)[/code] and [code]ActionTranslator.GetActionDetail(...)[/code] GetAction(...) did precisely what I wanted, populating the given ref Action with all of the data; however, while the source seems to indicate that GetActionDetail(...) should do the same thing (only using the ActionType as reference instead of the Key), the action passed to this method is not a ref, and so is not modified. And so my question: is the current behaviour of GetActionDetail(...) desired, or is it a bug (meaning should the Action be passed by ref)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
Anomolous GetActionDetail(...) Behaviour
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom