Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lehmden" data-source="post: 1121372" data-attributes="member: 109222">Hi.Any (final) skin definitely should support any view. It's the decision of the User to use it or not. We do all this primarily for the user, also we like and want this ourself...Personally I can live without CoverFlow as I only use it for demonstration purposes. Especially CoverFlow is something to impress guests and make them think about using MediaPortal themselves. I've seen this really often.... Spectacular 3D effects like CoverFlow, rotating Poster Wall or similar things are to show what's possible and for this are positive for acquiring more users... I know the main goal of Apollo One is not to be spectacular, but we definitely need such eye candy if we want MP2 to be more popular. With features like PIP or the centralized database we can impress advanced users who knows what's going on under the hood, but the average guy only wants the eye candy....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lehmden, post: 1121372, member: 109222"] Hi. Any (final) skin definitely should support any view. It's the decision of the User to use it or not. We do all this primarily for the user, also we like and want this ourself... Personally I can live without CoverFlow as I only use it for demonstration purposes. Especially CoverFlow is something to impress guests and make them think about using MediaPortal themselves. I've seen this really often.... Spectacular 3D effects like CoverFlow, rotating Poster Wall or similar things are to show what's possible and for this are positive for acquiring more users... I know the main goal of Apollo One is not to be spectacular, but we definitely need such eye candy if we want MP2 to be more popular. With features like PIP or the centralized database we can impress advanced users who knows what's going on under the hood, but the average guy only wants the eye candy.... [/QUOTE]

Verification