Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Marcus Venturi" data-source="post: 1005076" data-attributes="member: 121570">@<a href="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/members/wouter1971.84759/" target="_blank">wouter1971</a>: The problem is, that in your screenshot I can see only the UPnP services, but LG has implemented an extension of the UPnP protocol they call UDAP procotol. The commands for remote control of the TV are part of that UDAP protocol. Therefore the normal Intel UPnP tools do not recognize these services.&nbsp;Really a great idea from LG to extend an existing standard in a way that makes it incompatible to the existing implementations. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" />&nbsp;Does the following line work with your TV?&nbsp;<a href="http://192.168.178.27:8080/udap/api/data?target=netrcu.XML" target="_blank">http://192.168.178.27:8080/udap/api/data?target=netrcu.XML</a></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Marcus Venturi, post: 1005076, member: 121570"] @[URL='https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/members/wouter1971.84759/']wouter1971[/URL]: The problem is, that in your screenshot I can see only the UPnP services, but LG has implemented an extension of the UPnP protocol they call UDAP procotol. The commands for remote control of the TV are part of that UDAP protocol. Therefore the normal Intel UPnP tools do not recognize these services. Really a great idea from LG to extend an existing standard in a way that makes it incompatible to the existing implementations. :( Does the following line work with your TV? [url]http://192.168.178.27:8080/udap/api/data?target=netrcu.XML[/url] [/QUOTE]

Verification