Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ziphnor" data-source="post: 90576" data-attributes="member: 14215">Argh, made another test, and it does seem tourettes is correct. When using graphedit apparently DXVA is not enabled so therefore i couldnt tell the difference.When i use MP to playback a HD recording it is pretty obvious that DXVA is being disabled ( 22% cpu on my HTPC with no postprocessing vs. 60-70% with it). With SD material you cant really tell the difference .I suppose the CPU usage could be okay for some users, but it also seems that some of the image enhancements are disabled. This certainly doesnt bode well...Do anyone have some more information on this? All post-processing filters have this issue apparently. However, im confused as to why the image quality is worse just because its done in software mode?I suppose i should consider finding a way to only add the filter to the graph for selected channels, or maybe add it dynamically on request. For now though, i will try to wrap it up as is.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ziphnor, post: 90576, member: 14215"] Argh, made another test, and it does seem tourettes is correct. When using graphedit apparently DXVA is not enabled so therefore i couldnt tell the difference. When i use MP to playback a HD recording it is pretty obvious that DXVA is being disabled ( 22% cpu on my HTPC with no postprocessing vs. 60-70% with it). With SD material you cant really tell the difference . I suppose the CPU usage could be okay for some users, but it also seems that some of the image enhancements are disabled. This certainly doesnt bode well... Do anyone have some more information on this? All post-processing filters have this issue apparently. However, im confused as to why the image quality is worse just because its done in software mode? I suppose i should consider finding a way to only add the filter to the graph for selected channels, or maybe add it dynamically on request. For now though, i will try to wrap it up as is. [/QUOTE]

Verification