Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="vapourEyes" data-source="post: 1270925" data-attributes="member: 143065">Apologies [USER=141969]@CyberSimian[/USER], I did not address this earlier.There is a reason I ended up with a threshold.There may be channels on MUX-a - that are not on MUX-b, so I don't want to ignore the weaker MUX. I try not to include channels are likely too weak to display, from any MUX.BUT... I agree with you. A fuller implementation should store strength per-channel, ejecting weaker channels in the face of a new stronger channel.BUT... I would also like ALL channels good enough to display, from any MUX.I hope that answers it better.</blockquote>