Reply to thread

Message

Understood .
I invented the numbers to illustrate the principle; I was not suggesing that they were reasonable!

Your example panel for these new features looks very good, but I would suggest:

(1) Rename the first section from "Tune to strongest channel" to "Duplicate channels". This makes it clearer that we are specifically addressing channels where two identical versions are found during the scan.

(2) Is "Enable this alternative tune" needed? If "Retain strongest channel" is not selected, isn't the eliminate-duplicates processing disabled? Or is there still some other processing occurring that should be disabled?

-- from CyberSimian in the UK

<blockquote data-quote="CyberSimian" data-source="post: 1270971" data-attributes="member: 141969">Understood <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite24" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs Up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />.I invented the numbers to illustrate the principle; I was not suggesing that they were reasonable! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />Your example panel for these new features looks very good, but I would suggest:(1) Rename the first section from &quot;Tune to strongest channel&quot; to &quot;Duplicate channels&quot;. This makes it clearer that we are specifically addressing channels where two identical versions are found during the scan.(2) Is &quot;Enable this alternative tune&quot; needed? If &quot;Retain strongest channel&quot; is not selected, isn't the eliminate-duplicates processing disabled? Or is there still some other processing occurring that should be disabled? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite12" alt="o_O" title="Er... what?&nbsp; &nbsp; o_O" loading="lazy" data-shortname="o_O" />-- from CyberSimian in the UK</blockquote>

[QUOTE="CyberSimian, post: 1270971, member: 141969"] Understood (y). I invented the numbers to illustrate the principle; I was not suggesing that they were reasonable! :D Your example panel for these new features looks very good, but I would suggest: (1) Rename the first section from "Tune to strongest channel" to "Duplicate channels". This makes it clearer that we are specifically addressing channels where two identical versions are found during the scan. (2) Is "Enable this alternative tune" needed? If "Retain strongest channel" is [b]not[/b] selected, isn't the eliminate-duplicates processing disabled? Or is there still some other processing occurring that should be disabled? o_O -- from CyberSimian in the UK [/QUOTE]