home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
Improvement Suggestions
Automatically Tune to Strongest Duplicate Channel
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CyberSimian" data-source="post: 1275290" data-attributes="member: 141969"><p>I have tested the latest version, using the four tests that I listed in my previous post. This time all four tests produced the expected results <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite24" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs Up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />. Here is the screen shot for test (4):</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]206213[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This time I also decided to perform an "All regions" scan to see if I could receive any channels from other transmitters, but as expected none were received:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]206214[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]206215[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>So I am not in a position to be able to test the action of selecting the strongest of duplicate channels. If anyone else is reading this thread, and you live in a region where two or more transmitters give receivable signals, now would be the time to download the latest build and test it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />. It has no known problems, but it is always a good idea to backup your system before installing the changed files, just in case.</p><p></p><p>Finally, as I have never performed an all-regions scan before, I was curious to see how long it would take, so I timed it. It took <strong>11 mins 20 secs</strong>. This time is probably typical for the UK, but other countries may take longer or shorter times to scan all frequencies.</p><p></p><p>-- from CyberSimian in the UK</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CyberSimian, post: 1275290, member: 141969"] I have tested the latest version, using the four tests that I listed in my previous post. This time all four tests produced the expected results (y). Here is the screen shot for test (4): [ATTACH]206213[/ATTACH] This time I also decided to perform an "All regions" scan to see if I could receive any channels from other transmitters, but as expected none were received: [ATTACH]206214[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]206215[/ATTACH] So I am not in a position to be able to test the action of selecting the strongest of duplicate channels. If anyone else is reading this thread, and you live in a region where two or more transmitters give receivable signals, now would be the time to download the latest build and test it :D. It has no known problems, but it is always a good idea to backup your system before installing the changed files, just in case. Finally, as I have never performed an all-regions scan before, I was curious to see how long it would take, so I timed it. It took [b]11 mins 20 secs[/b]. This time is probably typical for the UK, but other countries may take longer or shorter times to scan all frequencies. -- from CyberSimian in the UK [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
Improvement Suggestions
Automatically Tune to Strongest Duplicate Channel
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom