Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="offbyone" data-source="post: 1134199" data-attributes="member: 73415">Nice work!The OnlineVideosWorkflowModel exposes:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">SelectedSite</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">SelectedCategory</li>
</ul>which will be set when you are inside of a site or category <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />Both have a Name you can bind to in xaml and for the Site you can display an icon with a converter - should already be in your xaml. The Category directly exposes a Thumb to bind to.What I find a bit distracting on the eye is the first page (list of sites). If there is no visual cue around all the icons and they are transparent, so each one shaped differently, then it's hard to see a line or distinction. Some kind of border of different background would make it feel more ordered I think.There is one step in your hierarchy missing in the end, a detail view. It's only available on few sites, best examples are IMDB and iTunes trailers.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="offbyone, post: 1134199, member: 73415"] Nice work! The OnlineVideosWorkflowModel exposes: [LIST] [*]SelectedSite [*]SelectedCategory [/LIST] which will be set when you are inside of a site or category ;) Both have a Name you can bind to in xaml and for the Site you can display an icon with a converter - should already be in your xaml. The Category directly exposes a Thumb to bind to. What I find a bit distracting on the eye is the first page (list of sites). If there is no visual cue around all the icons and they are transparent, so each one shaped differently, then it's hard to see a line or distinction. Some kind of border of different background would make it feel more ordered I think. There is one step in your hierarchy missing in the end, a detail view. It's only available on few sites, best examples are IMDB and iTunes trailers. [/QUOTE]

Verification