Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="polarie" data-source="post: 629502" data-attributes="member: 45042">AW: Bluray Handler 0.9.3 (BETA)hi there ...öhm sitting here ... beating myself that i didn't found that thread earlier <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />just a (maybe) stupid question:how important is the use of SAF 5.0 (experimental)?it is prio 1? absolut necessary?couse all my machines have SAF 4 Stable ...and they run with a real good picture-quality... BUT i like to have that plugin running ...do i really need to change to SAF 5.0?it is a better choice?i read that some have the SAF4 running (page 2 and 3 of the thread)...short info would be nice ...BIG <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="polarie, post: 629502, member: 45042"] [b]AW: Bluray Handler 0.9.3 (BETA)[/b] hi there ... öhm sitting here ... beating myself that i didn't found that thread earlier :D just a (maybe) stupid question: how important is the use of SAF 5.0 (experimental)? it is prio 1? absolut necessary? couse all my machines have SAF 4 Stable ... and they run with a real good picture-quality... BUT i like to have that plugin running ... do i really need to change to SAF 5.0? it is a better choice? i read that some have the SAF4 running (page 2 and 3 of the thread)... short info would be nice ... [b]BIG [/b] :thx: [/QUOTE]

Verification