Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="eb1965" data-source="post: 210577" data-attributes="member: 43859">I have a proposal to make the plugin a little bit better (...i hope, you think in the same way...).I know, that it's a very personal perception to define, what a better an what a not so likable structure ist. This is my point of view, maybe other people would find the actual structure better. Ripped files are being saved in the default directory, for example in e:\music\... The plugin saves the files in a new directory, name by the following rule : ARTIST - ALBUM, for example in e:\music\Pink Floyd - Another brick in the wall\...My proposal ist, to save the files into TWO directories, the first for the ARTIST, the second for the ALBUM, for example in e:\music\Pink Floyd\Another brick in the wall\...So you can collect several albums of the same artist in ONE directory.In my opinion, albums would be clearlier arranged.So, many thanks for redesign ;-) (if the developper agree's with me...)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="eb1965, post: 210577, member: 43859"] I have a proposal to make the plugin a little bit better (...i hope, you think in the same way...). I know, that it's a very personal perception to define, what a better an what a not so likable structure ist. This is my point of view, maybe other people would find the actual structure better. Ripped files are being saved in the default directory, for example in e:\music\... The plugin saves the files in a new directory, name by the following rule : ARTIST - ALBUM, for example in e:\music\Pink Floyd - Another brick in the wall\... My proposal ist, to save the files into TWO directories, the first for the ARTIST, the second for the ALBUM, for example in e:\music\Pink Floyd\Another brick in the wall\... So you can collect several albums of the same artist in ONE directory. In my opinion, albums would be clearlier arranged. So, many thanks for redesign ;-) (if the developper agree's with me...) [/QUOTE]

Verification