Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TonyT" data-source="post: 1299335" data-attributes="member: 163971">Hi,&nbsp;&nbsp; until recently i had my tv channels selectable by typing the channel number on my remote. for instance, i hit the number 9 and up comes channel 9. my current channel list is123791011121315(etc)now when i hit the number 9 on my remote it selects the 9th channel in the list. in this instance it brings up channel 13. If I want channel 9 I have to hit 5 on the remote.i checked the TV server configuration and the channel numbers are still set properly. I even tried resorting the channels by name which changed the display order in the guide but when hitting 9 on the remote it again brings up the 9th channel in the newly sorted list.i was running version 1.31 so i tried upgrading to the latest version, 1.33 but i still encounter the same behaviour.Of course i can still scroll up and down the channel list but i liked being able to go right to the desired channel without all the extra fiddling.Anyone else seeing this behaviour?Cheers,Tony</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TonyT, post: 1299335, member: 163971"] Hi, until recently i had my tv channels selectable by typing the channel number on my remote. for instance, i hit the number 9 and up comes channel 9. my current channel list is 1 2 3 7 9 10 11 12 13 15 (etc) now when i hit the number 9 on my remote it selects the 9th channel in the list. in this instance it brings up channel 13. If I want channel 9 I have to hit 5 on the remote. i checked the TV server configuration and the channel numbers are still set properly. I even tried resorting the channels by name which changed the display order in the guide but when hitting 9 on the remote it again brings up the 9th channel in the newly sorted list. i was running version 1.31 so i tried upgrading to the latest version, 1.33 but i still encounter the same behaviour. Of course i can still scroll up and down the channel list but i liked being able to go right to the desired channel without all the extra fiddling. Anyone else seeing this behaviour? Cheers, Tony [/QUOTE]

Verification