Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Anthony Vaughan" data-source="post: 1286878" data-attributes="member: 153283">Thank you for your comments.To me, the best solution would seem to be to offer this as an option for people who don't want to use all of the old extensions but want to have a multi-user setup.That is exactly what I feel. Links are provided to view actor/movie information directly from the IMDB website, so why store that data in MP? To me it's a major shortcoming&nbsp; because it makes scanning take forever. One of the changes I am going to make for my version is to make actor/movie data optional when scanning the first time around. This cuts down scan time from minutes to seconds. If you are interested, I will happily keep you apprised of what I am doing. I suspect we both use MP is the same way <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> .</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Anthony Vaughan, post: 1286878, member: 153283"] Thank you for your comments. To me, the best solution would seem to be to offer this as an option for people who don't want to use all of the old extensions but want to have a multi-user setup. That is exactly what I feel. Links are provided to view actor/movie information directly from the IMDB website, so why store that data in MP? To me it's a major shortcoming because it makes scanning take forever. One of the changes I am going to make for my version is to make actor/movie data optional when scanning the first time around. This cuts down scan time from minutes to seconds. If you are interested, I will happily keep you apprised of what I am doing. I suspect we both use MP is the same way :) . [/QUOTE]

Verification