home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Language specific support
Deutsches MediaPortal Forum
Hard- und Software rund um den HTPC
Hardware
TV-Karten
Digital Devices Octopus NET CT/2 Erfahrungen?
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1061188" data-attributes="member: 82144"><p>Yeah, sorry - I have a bad habit of getting stuck into code and then getting distracted before I completely finish implementing or fixing it. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite10" alt=":oops:" title="Oops! :oops:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":oops:" /></p><p>Having said that, the less bureaucracy, the more productive I seem to be. I like the freedom of being able to leave things broken on the floor at least for a while when working on big features or architectural changes. Of course I'd never do this with the master branch (!!!).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm not managing releases, but in terms of code completion (at least to the point of compiling) I'm expecting at least a few more weeks of work... if not more. I'm not very good at estimating in terms of man-hours... and my time availability varies quite wildly.</p><p>Basically I'm adding CableCARD tuner support, dealing with some PID filtering stuff (which relates to the SAT>IP URL pids parameter - it gets a bit complicated when dealing with encrypted channels and dynamic PMT changes), and generally fixing TODOs and broken code sections.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, for DVB-S/S2 and DVB-T/T2. The Onet is a SAT>IP device, so just follow the SAT>IP specifications:</p><p><a href="http://www.satip.info/resources" target="_blank">http://www.satip.info/resources</a></p><p></p><p>DVB-T/T2 details are in the annexes as it was added later. I note that not all of the parameters listed for tuning are required. As with BDA tuners, you only need the frequency and bandwidth for DVB-T. For DVB-T2 you might need the PLP ID as well.</p><p></p><p>The Onet is a little bit non-standard in a few ways. One of them is the DVB-C/C2 support. As the first SAT>IP tuner that supports DVB-T/T2 ("TERR>IP") or DVB-C/C2 ("KABEL>IP"), it is totally unofficial and undocumented. Tuning of encrypted channels (x_pmt) is also undocumented and unofficial. You also can't get signal strength/quality readings from the Onet. The list goes on...</p><p>FreakyJ knows more, but basically the Onet was released in beta and has been improved with firmware updates ever since.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1061188, member: 82144"] Yeah, sorry - I have a bad habit of getting stuck into code and then getting distracted before I completely finish implementing or fixing it. :oops: Having said that, the less bureaucracy, the more productive I seem to be. I like the freedom of being able to leave things broken on the floor at least for a while when working on big features or architectural changes. Of course I'd never do this with the master branch (!!!). I'm not managing releases, but in terms of code completion (at least to the point of compiling) I'm expecting at least a few more weeks of work... if not more. I'm not very good at estimating in terms of man-hours... and my time availability varies quite wildly. Basically I'm adding CableCARD tuner support, dealing with some PID filtering stuff (which relates to the SAT>IP URL pids parameter - it gets a bit complicated when dealing with encrypted channels and dynamic PMT changes), and generally fixing TODOs and broken code sections. Yes, for DVB-S/S2 and DVB-T/T2. The Onet is a SAT>IP device, so just follow the SAT>IP specifications: [url]http://www.satip.info/resources[/url] DVB-T/T2 details are in the annexes as it was added later. I note that not all of the parameters listed for tuning are required. As with BDA tuners, you only need the frequency and bandwidth for DVB-T. For DVB-T2 you might need the PLP ID as well. The Onet is a little bit non-standard in a few ways. One of them is the DVB-C/C2 support. As the first SAT>IP tuner that supports DVB-T/T2 ("TERR>IP") or DVB-C/C2 ("KABEL>IP"), it is totally unofficial and undocumented. Tuning of encrypted channels (x_pmt) is also undocumented and unofficial. You also can't get signal strength/quality readings from the Onet. The list goes on... FreakyJ knows more, but basically the Onet was released in beta and has been improved with firmware updates ever since. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Language specific support
Deutsches MediaPortal Forum
Hard- und Software rund um den HTPC
Hardware
TV-Karten
Digital Devices Octopus NET CT/2 Erfahrungen?
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom