Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 804768" data-attributes="member: 82144">Hi DjeC64I've been taking a much needed break from MP work so I'm sorry I have not looked at your logs.I think you need to be very clear about where the limitations and features are implemented. At the lowest level, the limit is in the CAM and its firmware. You said that your CAM can decrypt multiple channels simultaneously - okay. The tuner driver is the next possible bottleneck. It must provide a way for the higher software (like MP or DVBViewer) to tell the CAM to decrypt multiple channels. DD do not provide any way for us to do that so the bottleneck is there. If DD implemented &quot;STD&quot; support then I think their tuners would be pretty unbeatable. We would implement support as soon as we got the required information from them. I suspect that they haven't implemented it since it is impossible or very difficult to include with their implementation of MTD.mm</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 804768, member: 82144"] Hi DjeC64 I've been taking a much needed break from MP work so I'm sorry I have not looked at your logs. I think you need to be very clear about where the limitations and features are implemented. At the lowest level, the limit is in the CAM and its firmware. You said that your CAM can decrypt multiple channels simultaneously - okay. The tuner driver is the next possible bottleneck. It must provide a way for the higher software (like MP or DVBViewer) to tell the CAM to decrypt multiple channels. DD do not provide any way for us to do that so the bottleneck is there. If DD implemented "STD" support then I think their tuners would be pretty unbeatable. We would implement support as soon as we got the required information from them. I suspect that they haven't implemented it since it is impossible or very difficult to include with their implementation of MTD. mm [/QUOTE]

Verification