home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
Improvement Suggestions
EPG grab improvement
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SciDoctor" data-source="post: 88736" data-attributes="member: 11346"><p>You are not taking into account worst case scenario which you should do with real time data grab .</p><p></p><p>The broadcsters don't guarantee that all data is present and error free.</p><p></p><p>- does not simply scans all channels in any mux (as you say it does).</p><p></p><p>It does if every channel times out WORST case scenario</p><p></p><p>- it skips channels for which epg has been received</p><p></p><p>In skipping a channel for data received there is NO guarantee that the EPG is now fully populated for that channel</p><p></p><p>- it skips channels for which epg has not been received or timed out</p><p>- meaning (in the uk situation) it moves to the next mux very quickly</p><p></p><p>Which is quicker (worst case) 200mins to grab from MUX A to get to MUX B or 10mins.</p><p></p><p>You could have grabbed 3 channels from 6 MUXs in the time it took to bash the living daylights out of MUX A and got no EPG data.</p><p></p><p>As the time is the same what ever the grab result the total time to grab from every channel (no missing cannles) is the same for both methods.</p><p></p><p>My proposed method cuts out wasted time on a MUX which may have no EPG data available because of errors and quickly covers the MUX's.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SciDoctor, post: 88736, member: 11346"] You are not taking into account worst case scenario which you should do with real time data grab . The broadcsters don't guarantee that all data is present and error free. - does not simply scans all channels in any mux (as you say it does). It does if every channel times out WORST case scenario - it skips channels for which epg has been received In skipping a channel for data received there is NO guarantee that the EPG is now fully populated for that channel - it skips channels for which epg has not been received or timed out - meaning (in the uk situation) it moves to the next mux very quickly Which is quicker (worst case) 200mins to grab from MUX A to get to MUX B or 10mins. You could have grabbed 3 channels from 6 MUXs in the time it took to bash the living daylights out of MUX A and got no EPG data. As the time is the same what ever the grab result the total time to grab from every channel (no missing cannles) is the same for both methods. My proposed method cuts out wasted time on a MUX which may have no EPG data available because of errors and quickly covers the MUX's. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
Improvement Suggestions
EPG grab improvement
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom