Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="SciDoctor" data-source="post: 88754" data-attributes="member: 11346">Your grab.MUX A CH1 ,MUX A CH2 ,MUX A CH3......MUX A CH (last channel)MUX B CH1, MUX B CH 2, MUX B CH3 .....MUX B CH (last channle)MUX C CH1, MUX C CH2 etc MUX D etcAT END OF AVAILABLE MUX REPEAT FROM MUX A CH 1My proposed grabMUX A CH 1, MUX B CH 1 ,MUX C CH 1, MUX D CH1 ........MUX (last mux) CH 1MUX A CH 2, MUX B CH 2, MUX C CH 2, MUX D CH2 ........MUX (last mux) CH 2MUX A CH 3 ,MUX B,CH 3 ................................................MUX (last mux) CH 3AT END OF AVAILBLE CHANNELS REPEAT FROM MUX A CH 1Errors are handle the same way .A grab is a grab whatever data is received is put in the database in the same way as your existing mehtod.You can still choose to miss a channel if the previous grab has contained data that has populated the databse if you want , i wouldn't so as to catch as much data as possible.NO MUX is being missed NO CHANNEL is being missed , so this is a universal grab.As I have tried to explain there is no way to change the MAX time if every channel is EPG data independent BOTH methods take the same time BUT where channels share EPG data the time is reduced .</blockquote>

[QUOTE="SciDoctor, post: 88754, member: 11346"] Your grab. MUX A CH1 ,MUX A CH2 ,MUX A CH3......MUX A CH (last channel) MUX B CH1, MUX B CH 2, MUX B CH3 .....MUX B CH (last channle) MUX C CH1, MUX C CH2 etc MUX D etc AT END OF AVAILABLE MUX REPEAT FROM MUX A CH 1 My proposed grab MUX A CH 1, MUX B CH 1 ,MUX C CH 1, MUX D CH1 ........MUX (last mux) CH 1 MUX A CH 2, MUX B CH 2, MUX C CH 2, MUX D CH2 ........MUX (last mux) CH 2 MUX A CH 3 ,MUX B,CH 3 ................................................MUX (last mux) CH 3 AT END OF AVAILBLE CHANNELS REPEAT FROM MUX A CH 1 Errors are handle the same way . A grab is a grab whatever data is received is put in the database in the same way as your existing mehtod. You can still choose to miss a channel if the previous grab has contained data that has populated the databse if you want , i wouldn't so as to catch as much data as possible. NO MUX is being missed NO CHANNEL is being missed , so this is a universal grab. As I have tried to explain there is no way to change the MAX time if every channel is EPG data independent BOTH methods take the same time BUT where channels share EPG data the time is reduced . [/QUOTE]

Verification