Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 818936" data-attributes="member: 10858">It shouldn't mid about corrupted / dropped data. All it does is it schedules the 1st sample after the discontinuity point to be rendered in time when the rtStart tells. Of course there could be some bug, but at least I haven't noticed such during the 1,5 years the renderer has been in use.Was the timestamps modified somehow? Maybe a backwards jump?I wish I would... but it is pretty much impossible with real work + blu-ray development. I wish just that someone could continue my work - it will is probably the only way how the audio renderer could advance (especially when I personally wont have any issues with it <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 818936, member: 10858"] It shouldn't mid about corrupted / dropped data. All it does is it schedules the 1st sample after the discontinuity point to be rendered in time when the rtStart tells. Of course there could be some bug, but at least I haven't noticed such during the 1,5 years the renderer has been in use. Was the timestamps modified somehow? Maybe a backwards jump? I wish I would... but it is pretty much impossible with real work + blu-ray development. I wish just that someone could continue my work - it will is probably the only way how the audio renderer could advance (especially when I personally wont have any issues with it :P) [/QUOTE]

Verification