home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
other features (of release or svn versions)
Feature request - integrate patched Core.dll (FrameGrabber) for AtmoLight
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dadeo" data-source="post: 1060920" data-attributes="member: 27204"><p>I'm a bit lost - we're talking about <a href="https://issues.team-mediaportal.com/browse/MP1-4248" target="_blank">Issue 4248</a>: Add access to Framegrabber for 3rd plugins (Atmolight) right? which was already added to 1.6 pre-release right?</p><p>If so, yes it would be good to make a note of it in <a href="http://wiki.team-mediaportal.com/1_MEDIAPORTAL_1/18_Contribute/6_Plugins/Plugin_Related_Changes/1.5.0_to_1.6.0" target="_blank">Plugin Related Changes > 1.5.0 to 1.6.0 </a>but tbh I have no clue what to say to make it more generic (i.e. not just a patch so Atmolight plugin does not need to modify core) or when/how a plugin dev would use it. Is it enough to say something like "plugins can now access FrameGrabber to capture video stream(s) inside MP renderer." and assume they know what to do correctly???</p><p></p><p>Do you want to try and create a new page there and I can edit for grammar/English? Good practice azzuro <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> Or I can add the page with what I think is clear from the issue, and you can update it for technical accuracy <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dadeo, post: 1060920, member: 27204"] I'm a bit lost - we're talking about [URL='https://issues.team-mediaportal.com/browse/MP1-4248']Issue 4248[/URL]: Add access to Framegrabber for 3rd plugins (Atmolight) right? which was already added to 1.6 pre-release right? If so, yes it would be good to make a note of it in [URL='http://wiki.team-mediaportal.com/1_MEDIAPORTAL_1/18_Contribute/6_Plugins/Plugin_Related_Changes/1.5.0_to_1.6.0']Plugin Related Changes > 1.5.0 to 1.6.0 [/URL]but tbh I have no clue what to say to make it more generic (i.e. not just a patch so Atmolight plugin does not need to modify core) or when/how a plugin dev would use it. Is it enough to say something like "plugins can now access FrameGrabber to capture video stream(s) inside MP renderer." and assume they know what to do correctly??? Do you want to try and create a new page there and I can edit for grammar/English? Good practice azzuro ;) Or I can add the page with what I think is clear from the issue, and you can update it for technical accuracy ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
other features (of release or svn versions)
Feature request - integrate patched Core.dll (FrameGrabber) for AtmoLight
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom