Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dvdfreak" data-source="post: 324796" data-attributes="member: 21313">Everything in life is a matter of give and take.&nbsp; We need to outweigh the effort and added complexity against the beneft.Currently For The Record is perfect for multi-seat use, since the whole architecture is multi-seat from the ground up.&nbsp; You can even install the Web Access site or the IM-Bot on a different machine than your Core Services, and of course as many clients or even recorder/tuners as you wish on any machine on your LAN.&nbsp; Clients can even connect from anywhere in the world over HTTPS (except for watching/streaming of course, but you can edit schedules to your heart's content <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />).So we prefer to keep the flexibility like that.So far For The Record users are very enthousiastic about its stability, and this is certainly in part due to the fact that the architecture is solid and patch-free.&nbsp; So adding specific things for single seat situations may add complexity we prefer to avoid.&nbsp; Just saying that all this needs to be looked at carefully.&nbsp; Stability comes first, features come next.&nbsp; And features on their own need to be outweighed as well of course, because we love killer features as much as the next guy <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="dvdfreak, post: 324796, member: 21313"] Everything in life is a matter of give and take. We need to outweigh the effort and added complexity against the beneft. Currently [b]For The Record[/b] is perfect for multi-seat use, since the whole architecture is multi-seat from the ground up. You can even install the Web Access site or the IM-Bot on a different machine than your Core Services, and of course as many clients or even recorder/tuners as you wish on any machine on your LAN. Clients can even connect from anywhere in the world over HTTPS (except for watching/streaming of course, but you can edit schedules to your heart's content :)). So we prefer to keep the flexibility like that. So far [b]For The Record[/b] users are [U]very[/U] enthousiastic about its stability, and this is certainly in part due to the fact that the architecture is solid and patch-free. So adding specific things for single seat situations may add complexity we prefer to avoid. Just saying that all this needs to be looked at carefully. Stability comes first, features come next. And features on their own need to be outweighed as well of course, because we love killer features as much as the next guy :D [/QUOTE]

Verification