home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
For The Record 1.3.3 Released
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dvdfreak" data-source="post: 325139" data-attributes="member: 21313"><p>Yes, this could indeed be interesting. However, where is the <u>real</u> problem?</p><p></p><p>OK, I hoped to move on to more important things, but let me get back to this one more (last?) time <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>We already know that with RTSP image quality remains identical, skipping is reportedly a bit slower and there may be dropped frames for HD streams on a network.</p><p></p><p>But dropped frames for HD on a network is only an issue for multiseat users to begin with, so that point is moot. I'm assuming there's no problem with HD on a single-seat machine since there's no actual network traffic (it's straight to localhost). And noone has complained about skipping slowness yet as far as I know.</p><p></p><p>So what are we fixing then? I don't see a problem that needs fixing, only a theoretical technical remark.</p><p></p><p>I'd rather concentrate on improving the live TV support, adding some usability improvements to the MP client, etc... All <u>much</u> more important than an almost <em>invented</em> problem... Or am I mistaken?</p><p></p><p>In the mean time <strong>For The Record</strong> works equally well for single-seat and multiseat users <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dvdfreak, post: 325139, member: 21313"] Yes, this could indeed be interesting. However, where is the [u]real[/u] problem? OK, I hoped to move on to more important things, but let me get back to this one more (last?) time ;) We already know that with RTSP image quality remains identical, skipping is reportedly a bit slower and there may be dropped frames for HD streams on a network. But dropped frames for HD on a network is only an issue for multiseat users to begin with, so that point is moot. I'm assuming there's no problem with HD on a single-seat machine since there's no actual network traffic (it's straight to localhost). And noone has complained about skipping slowness yet as far as I know. So what are we fixing then? I don't see a problem that needs fixing, only a theoretical technical remark. I'd rather concentrate on improving the live TV support, adding some usability improvements to the MP client, etc... All [u]much[/u] more important than an almost [i]invented[/i] problem... Or am I mistaken? In the mean time [b]For The Record[/b] works equally well for single-seat and multiseat users :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
For The Record 1.3.3 Released
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom