home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Products
TV-Server
For The Record - The rule-based scheduling suite
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dvdfreak" data-source="post: 201324" data-attributes="member: 21313"><p>You don't need the code for that, honestly. What I posted is sufficient, and I never got feedback on that actually. </p><p></p><p>And anyway, from what Broceliande posted it is clear there is no room for integrating TvScheduler the way I propose it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm perfectly fine with that, but I defend the architecture I'm using <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> I think the stability of TvScheduler is enough "good press" for the architecture I propose. The scheduling is many times more powerful than the one in TVE3, and from the feedback I get there are very few bugs so far.</p><p></p><p>I have no wish to prematurely release the source code and see it being mashed up into something I cannot support. Because it looks like that is exactly what is going to happen.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm definately not dropping this project, I will see how this will progress. I will keep posting beta's here if there's still interest in people testing this and following how this continues to grow into something usable and stable.</p><p></p><p>I was really hoping TVE3 would be the recording part of the big picture, with TvScheduler being the scheduling part. But I guess it will play out differently <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dvdfreak, post: 201324, member: 21313"] You don't need the code for that, honestly. What I posted is sufficient, and I never got feedback on that actually. And anyway, from what Broceliande posted it is clear there is no room for integrating TvScheduler the way I propose it. I'm perfectly fine with that, but I defend the architecture I'm using ;) I think the stability of TvScheduler is enough "good press" for the architecture I propose. The scheduling is many times more powerful than the one in TVE3, and from the feedback I get there are very few bugs so far. I have no wish to prematurely release the source code and see it being mashed up into something I cannot support. Because it looks like that is exactly what is going to happen. I'm definately not dropping this project, I will see how this will progress. I will keep posting beta's here if there's still interest in people testing this and following how this continues to grow into something usable and stable. I was really hoping TVE3 would be the recording part of the big picture, with TvScheduler being the scheduling part. But I guess it will play out differently :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Products
TV-Server
For The Record - The rule-based scheduling suite
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom