home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Products
TV-Server
For The Record - The rule-based scheduling suite
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dvdfreak" data-source="post: 213101" data-attributes="member: 21313"><p>You'll have to ask the MP devs for their reasons, I can't really say they have been very enthousiastic so far. I've started a few attempts at getting a constructive dialogue going, to see how this could be integrated, but I'm more or less done with that as this was getting nowhere fast <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>If I can't convince the devs of the strength of a service-oriented architecture, not even by showing the results here there's really not much more I can do. TV Scheduler has rapidly gone from the core service I always intended it to be, to a usable plugin solution with a full-featured management console, HTTPS remote access and now also with web access.</p><p></p><p>The reason all this could be accomplished so relatively quickly is largely due to the choice of core architecture, some might say even the simple choice to <em>have</em> an architecture <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> The whole system has been designed to be client/server from the start. And that design is paying off already.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dvdfreak, post: 213101, member: 21313"] You'll have to ask the MP devs for their reasons, I can't really say they have been very enthousiastic so far. I've started a few attempts at getting a constructive dialogue going, to see how this could be integrated, but I'm more or less done with that as this was getting nowhere fast ;) If I can't convince the devs of the strength of a service-oriented architecture, not even by showing the results here there's really not much more I can do. TV Scheduler has rapidly gone from the core service I always intended it to be, to a usable plugin solution with a full-featured management console, HTTPS remote access and now also with web access. The reason all this could be accomplished so relatively quickly is largely due to the choice of core architecture, some might say even the simple choice to [i]have[/i] an architecture ;) The whole system has been designed to be client/server from the start. And that design is paying off already. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Products
TV-Server
For The Record - The rule-based scheduling suite
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom