Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dvdfreak" data-source="post: 234310" data-attributes="member: 21313">Were you using a TCP or HTTPS connection to the server when you got the error?But you are right, it's due to an overflow when the rules become too complex.&nbsp; However, I thought I managed to bypass this problem by increasing the allowed buffer size, seems I missed out.Negating rules is an interesting suggestion, perhaps that makes sense, but then you'd also need most rules twice.&nbsp; Because you'd like to say something like: contains &quot;Planet&quot; but does not contain &quot;Red&quot;.Or you could combine both in one rule, so you could enter a contains rules in a certain way, something like: &quot;Planet;-Red&quot;.For channels we'd need a different &quot;Add&quot; button then, one that adds the channel in a NOT-way.&nbsp; Let me think a bit about this... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="dvdfreak, post: 234310, member: 21313"] Were you using a TCP or HTTPS connection to the server when you got the error? But you are right, it's due to an overflow when the rules become too complex. However, I thought I managed to bypass this problem by increasing the allowed buffer size, seems I missed out. Negating rules is an interesting suggestion, perhaps that makes sense, but then you'd also need most rules twice. Because you'd like to say something like: contains "Planet" but does [u]not[/u] contain "Red". Or you could combine both in one rule, so you could enter a contains rules in a certain way, something like: "Planet;-Red". For channels we'd need a different "Add" button then, one that adds the channel in a NOT-way. Let me think a bit about this... :) [/QUOTE]

Verification