home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
Video-Cards
GT430 vs GT520
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="logifuse" data-source="post: 833868" data-attributes="member: 110442"><p>The key question is how much of the content you watch is interlaced? i.e. most TV (live & recordings). If you are planning on using it for that, then the 430 is the way to go (as per that AnandTech article) as the bandwidth limitation of the 520 restricts its ability to do high quality deinterlacing.</p><p></p><p>I've run a 430 with LAV CUVID & LAV Filters with their highest settings for deinterlacing & the result is outstanding. Haven't tried a 520 (because of the design flaw, I haven't bothered to get one to test), but my onboard Nvidia GPUs (9400, ION, ION2) all struggle due to the low number of CUDA cores & show clear jaggies when using the MS decoder (as they can't do adaptive deinterlacing).</p><p></p><p>If your content is mainly progressive (MKVs, AVIs, BD, etc.), then the 520 will be fine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="logifuse, post: 833868, member: 110442"] The key question is how much of the content you watch is interlaced? i.e. most TV (live & recordings). If you are planning on using it for that, then the 430 is the way to go (as per that AnandTech article) as the bandwidth limitation of the 520 restricts its ability to do high quality deinterlacing. I've run a 430 with LAV CUVID & LAV Filters with their highest settings for deinterlacing & the result is outstanding. Haven't tried a 520 (because of the design flaw, I haven't bothered to get one to test), but my onboard Nvidia GPUs (9400, ION, ION2) all struggle due to the low number of CUDA cores & show clear jaggies when using the MS decoder (as they can't do adaptive deinterlacing). If your content is mainly progressive (MKVs, AVIs, BD, etc.), then the 520 will be fine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
Video-Cards
GT430 vs GT520
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
