If you look at the specs closely on the hauppauge site, you'll see the difference. The regular HVR-1300 comes with a remote, and IR receiver/transmitter. And, it also includes the WinTV software and (probably) the Intervideo Non-CSS MPEG2 decoders.
With the HVR-1300 MCE version you only get the card and the drivers to get them to work with MCE.
BTW, the HVR-1300 is supported by MP from release 0.1.3.0 only by downloading the new capturecarddefinitions.xml file. Next releases will support it by default. AFAIK both cards are supported by MP. So, if you already have a remote, I'd go for the MCE version. If you don't, I'd buy the MCE remote and still go for the MCE version...
Kind regards,
Michel
P.S.: Nice nickname! I play freestyle frisbee myself a lot, since this year.
Thanks for your reply. I'm glad your like the nickname
Regarding the difference between the two cards, from the HVR-1300 MCE page, I quote: "WinTV-HVR-1300 MCE-Kit comes with a Microsoft certified remote control.".
Likewise, from the HVR-1300 page, we can read: "With remote control for easy operation.".
With their new HVR product line, it seems Hauppauge has broken its tradition of not including a remote with products stamped 'MCE'.
Therefore, it's not very clear what really differenciates those two cards. Based on Hauppage site, both come with remote. From what I have seen so far, the HVR-1300 MCE is more expensive than the HVR-1300 model. I am also yet to come across the HVR-1300 MCE outside of the UK.
Like you, I want the MCE remote to control MP. If the HVR-1300 MCE comes with an MCE remote, then I kill two birds with one stone.
No my software encoded side of my card (Analogue) will timeshift using its own software. And all the Hardware cards will do it effortlessly because of direct output to file using little or no CPU time.
Hardware is better than software encoded for a little more money
DVB-T cards are all hardware as signal input/output mpeg2 anyway.
I'm not sure what the issue was, but I decided to try a different way of solving the problem.
My server has a 2.5Gbps port and the 10Gbps card I added, so I've connected the HD Homerun directly to the 2.5G port, and its solved the problem, I can now copy large multiple files to the server and not suffer with picture issues.
There is...
I'm not sure what the issue was, but I decided to try a different way of solving the problem.
My server has a 2.5Gbps port and the...
My MP1 installation works perfectly, except if I transfer large files to my server.
Network setup.
HD Homerun Quad tuner -...
FYI: I now got TV Server running also under Windows system user while being able to write to a network share (this means without having to start the service as a different user). The reason for me trying this out was that using the "different user for service" approach, there was one minor issue where TV Service could not write to the...
FYI: I now got TV Server running also under Windows system user while being able to write to a network share (this means without...
Hi everybody,
after recently setting up a Xen hypervisor with MediaPortal 1 TV Backend on Windows Server 2012 as a virtual machine...
Yes correct that would have solved it. I guess I was more interested in finding out what I had done to cause the problem as the error message was of no help.
By deleting everything I wouldn't have known so it was a learning curve for future reference.
Fully understood I thought that might be the case.
I also had some issues with...
Yes correct that would have solved it. I guess I was more interested in finding out what I had done to cause the problem as the...
I've just updated to Win 10 on a second drive and am installing MP 1.31. Having a bit of trouble with the install with the...