Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="piranha" data-source="post: 168518" data-attributes="member: 15076">Hi Dukus,thanks a lot for adding the new source.I think thanks to that we have found a reason why the coverart downloaded is such bad quality.I just used the new grabber to add one movie to the database, and I was surprised seeing the coverart being low res.I added Terminator 3, and the coverart for it is:<a href="http://www.gaz1.com/movdb/banners/graphical/81503-g3.jpg" target="_blank">http://www.gaz1.com/movdb/banners/graphical/81503-g3.jpg</a>Downloaded coverart you can see below:Original coverart file on the movdb: 419x619 (57355 bytes)Downloaded:Large: Terminator3L.jpg 344x512 (20034 bytes) - very bad qualityThumb: Terminator3.jpg 86x128 (4118 bytes) So obviously there is some conversion process in between.During this conversion we are loosing the image quality very very badly.Is this something you can look at?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="piranha, post: 168518, member: 15076"] Hi Dukus, thanks a lot for adding the new source. I think thanks to that we have found a reason why the coverart downloaded is such bad quality. I just used the new grabber to add one movie to the database, and I was surprised seeing the coverart being low res. I added Terminator 3, and the coverart for it is: [url]http://www.gaz1.com/movdb/banners/graphical/81503-g3.jpg[/url] Downloaded coverart you can see below: Original coverart file on the movdb: 419x619 (57355 bytes) Downloaded: Large: Terminator3L.jpg 344x512 (20034 bytes) - very bad quality Thumb: Terminator3.jpg 86x128 (4118 bytes) So obviously there is some conversion process in between. During this conversion we are loosing the image quality very very badly. Is this something you can look at? [/QUOTE]

Verification