Reply to thread

Message

Just checked the moviexml script and it is working as designed.

Example:
Gladiator (2000) - the xml info held on the site reports the MPARating as R which is captured by the script correctly

As I said before the movexml site is user driven, so if the informaiton displayed is incorrect go to the site and correct it (like people do with thetvdb.com for tvseries info)

hotel rwanda - again, noone on the site has rated it, go to the site and change it to PG-13

Votes - are again down to how many people have voted for a particular movie, not as many people use moviexml as IMDB so not all moveis will have been voted for.

The main reason I use moviexml is that the covers it pulls down are:
1. For the correct movie (compared with usual movie scrapper which always pulls down weird and wonderful covers!)
2. The coveres on the site are High res covers which look nice in MP.

I always have 2 grabbers in my search order, I refresh all my movies with moviexml first, then if I find one with rubbish info I tell it to rescan then choose the movie from IMDB which will pull it the correct info but keep my high res cover from moviexml. If you untick the option to get actor info this download only takes 1 second.

<blockquote data-quote="gamejester" data-source="post: 267875" data-attributes="member: 50634">Just checked the moviexml script and it is working as designed.Example:Gladiator (2000) - the xml info held on the site reports the MPARating as R which is captured by the script correctlyAs I said before the movexml site is user driven, so if the informaiton displayed is incorrect go to the site and correct it (like people do with thetvdb.com for tvseries info)hotel rwanda - again, noone on the site has rated it, go to the site and change it to PG-13Votes - are again down to how many people have voted for a particular movie, not as many people use moviexml as IMDB so not all moveis will have been voted for.The main reason I use moviexml is that the covers it pulls down are:1. For the correct movie (compared with usual movie scrapper which always pulls down weird and wonderful covers!)2. The coveres on the site are High res covers which look nice in MP.I always have 2 grabbers in my search order, I refresh all my movies with moviexml first, then if I find one with rubbish info I tell it to rescan then choose the movie from IMDB which will pull it the correct info but keep my high res cover from moviexml. If you untick the option to get actor info this download only takes 1 second.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="gamejester, post: 267875, member: 50634"] Just checked the moviexml script and it is working as designed. Example: Gladiator (2000) - the xml info held on the site reports the MPARating as R which is captured by the script correctly As I said before the movexml site is user driven, so if the informaiton displayed is incorrect go to the site and correct it (like people do with thetvdb.com for tvseries info) hotel rwanda - again, noone on the site has rated it, go to the site and change it to PG-13 Votes - are again down to how many people have voted for a particular movie, not as many people use moviexml as IMDB so not all moveis will have been voted for. The main reason I use moviexml is that the covers it pulls down are: 1. For the correct movie (compared with usual movie scrapper which always pulls down weird and wonderful covers!) 2. The coveres on the site are High res covers which look nice in MP. I always have 2 grabbers in my search order, I refresh all my movies with moviexml first, then if I find one with rubbish info I tell it to rescan then choose the movie from IMDB which will pull it the correct info but keep my high res cover from moviexml. If you untick the option to get actor info this download only takes 1 second. [/QUOTE]