home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
Video-Cards
Intel HD 4000 and HD 2500 - a good choice regards to video playback?
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joele" data-source="post: 1015761" data-attributes="member: 143002"><p>I just couldn't get the HD4000 to work for me even with latest drivers. The problem with the HD4000 is inconsistent performance in video playback, some videos (depending on bitrate and fps) I just really struggle to get playback not stuttering or if not stuttering then not in sync.. Core AV codec gave smooth playback but out of sync with audio by 2 seconds on some high bitrate H.264. lol, MS codec works the best on those intensive videos, but slight stutter and LAV is terrible on those very high bit-rate movies (good else-wise) even with hardware acceleration..</p><p> </p><p>I put in a cheap HD6450 and with LAV + hardware acceleration it was not perfect, MS codec is worse than with the HD4000 but with CoreAV codec it is absolutely perfect, not bad for AUD$35 card and $9 codec... I am sure I could tweak more but not stuffing around as even is fine even side-by-side 1080p 3d which is actually 3840x1080...</p><p> </p><p>HD4000 may have worked if I spent more time it did seem more powerful than the 6450 but worse drivers/optimization with the codecs, however for $35 extra it just wasn't worth the headache, for me..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joele, post: 1015761, member: 143002"] I just couldn't get the HD4000 to work for me even with latest drivers. The problem with the HD4000 is inconsistent performance in video playback, some videos (depending on bitrate and fps) I just really struggle to get playback not stuttering or if not stuttering then not in sync.. Core AV codec gave smooth playback but out of sync with audio by 2 seconds on some high bitrate H.264. lol, MS codec works the best on those intensive videos, but slight stutter and LAV is terrible on those very high bit-rate movies (good else-wise) even with hardware acceleration.. I put in a cheap HD6450 and with LAV + hardware acceleration it was not perfect, MS codec is worse than with the HD4000 but with CoreAV codec it is absolutely perfect, not bad for AUD$35 card and $9 codec... I am sure I could tweak more but not stuffing around as even is fine even side-by-side 1080p 3d which is actually 3840x1080... HD4000 may have worked if I spent more time it did seem more powerful than the 6450 but worse drivers/optimization with the codecs, however for $35 extra it just wasn't worth the headache, for me.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
Hardware
Video-Cards
Intel HD 4000 and HD 2500 - a good choice regards to video playback?
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom