Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mr. Pastry" data-source="post: 407980" data-attributes="member: 90580">Thanks for that. I had downloaded the software but hadn't got round to installing it. You saved me the bother!Not even that. Just 1.1. The card's excellent for text and photo display, which is what it was bought for, but that's about it.Regards,Mr. P.I had a look at it but I want something to replace Winamp on several machines on the network and it needs to run under Windoze. If I had a machine I could use purely as a media server then something like GeexBox would certainly be a strong contender.So far I haven't come across anything that comes close to being as good at doing what I want as Winamp. If it would only behave itself on my machine it would be perfect.Regards,Mr. P.I can't seem to stop the system merging these two posts, which are replies to different people/messages. Very strange behaviour! Sorry etheesdad and sbp. You deserve individual responses.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mr. Pastry, post: 407980, member: 90580"] Thanks for that. I had downloaded the software but hadn't got round to installing it. You saved me the bother! Not even that. Just 1.1. The card's excellent for text and photo display, which is what it was bought for, but that's about it. Regards, Mr. P. I had a look at it but I want something to replace Winamp on several machines on the network and it needs to run under Windoze. If I had a machine I could use purely as a media server then something like GeexBox would certainly be a strong contender. So far I haven't come across anything that comes close to being as good at doing what I want as Winamp. If it would only behave itself on my machine it would be perfect. Regards, Mr. P. [B]I can't seem to stop the system merging these two posts, which are replies to different people/messages. Very strange behaviour! Sorry etheesdad and sbp. You deserve individual responses.[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification