Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1181997" data-attributes="member: 82144">Hmmm, strange. I've attached my local copy for you.The specifications answer this in the &quot;Wake From Remote&quot; section. In short: yes for S1 and S3. S4 and S5 are optional.I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. What I can say is that the end-user must press a specific button on the remote which generates a specific code/command which the receiver recognises. Again, the &quot;Wake From Remote&quot; section explains the details.Yes, I was thinking along the same lines myself. MCE-compatible transceivers are generally considered the de-facto standard for HTPCs. Therefore if you were selling your design as a product, MCE-compatible designs would be the natural competition.Off the top of my head I can't think of any shortcomings. The design is quite flexible and comprehensive. For example, products aren't generally advertised as being able to teach a remote, however I assume that capability could be implemented by an interested software developer using the standard blaster/transmitter interface.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1181997, member: 82144"] Hmmm, strange. I've attached my local copy for you. The specifications answer this in the "Wake From Remote" section. In short: yes for S1 and S3. S4 and S5 are optional. I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. What I can say is that the end-user must press a specific button on the remote which generates a specific code/command which the receiver recognises. Again, the "Wake From Remote" section explains the details. Yes, I was thinking along the same lines myself. MCE-compatible transceivers are generally considered the de-facto standard for HTPCs. Therefore if you were selling your design as a product, MCE-compatible designs would be the natural competition. Off the top of my head I can't think of any shortcomings. The design is quite flexible and comprehensive. For example, products aren't generally advertised as being able to teach a remote, however I assume that capability could be implemented by an interested software developer using the standard blaster/transmitter interface. [/QUOTE]

Verification