home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
HTPC Projects
Low Cost HTPC (1080P)
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="outlive" data-source="post: 253865" data-attributes="member: 65611"><p>because a Progressive Scan image has a higher vertical resolution than an frame of an interlaced video with the same frame rate.</p><p>you are right that deinterlacing puts an additional strain on the hardware when using software mode, but modern GPU's support hardware deinterlacing, like Ati's AVIVO supports vector adaptive de-interlacing and video scaling.</p><p>thus putting processing power for progressive and interlaced on the same level, and in that case people tend to use the "higher" resolution as a benchmark</p><p></p><p>it's like comparing cpu's though their mhz count - still stupid but a rough guideline</p><p>but if you feel better i can change the titel to 1080i <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Edit: interesting tho, that a X2 BE-2400 with a x1250 while using CoreAVC is having problems with 1080i - you should have more then enough power <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="outlive, post: 253865, member: 65611"] because a Progressive Scan image has a higher vertical resolution than an frame of an interlaced video with the same frame rate. you are right that deinterlacing puts an additional strain on the hardware when using software mode, but modern GPU's support hardware deinterlacing, like Ati's AVIVO supports vector adaptive de-interlacing and video scaling. thus putting processing power for progressive and interlaced on the same level, and in that case people tend to use the "higher" resolution as a benchmark it's like comparing cpu's though their mhz count - still stupid but a rough guideline but if you feel better i can change the titel to 1080i :) Edit: interesting tho, that a X2 BE-2400 with a x1250 while using CoreAVC is having problems with 1080i - you should have more then enough power :S [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
HTPC Projects
Low Cost HTPC (1080P)
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom