home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
HTPC Projects
HTPC Projects
Lower-end HTPC project
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jdiffend" data-source="post: 10159" data-attributes="member: 10910"><p>The 9200 hardware was designed to support DirectX8.1 and the software drivers add the additional DirectX 9 functionality. This should not be an issue unless you run a DirectX 9 game with all the features enabled.</p><p>Turning on reflections, shadows, bump mapping and highest quality texture maps will turn a game into a slideshow... which is what I witnessed playing a DX9 game demo. The game was updating the picture about 1 frame per second... maybe a litte faster. My Radeon 9600se played full speed with everything on... I think the 9100 was about as fast when those settings I mentioned were off.</p><p></p><p>The 5200 does support DX9 but they stripped a lot out. Check out the comparison chart for the GeforceFX cards on Nvidea's website. For about $10 more there's the Radeon 9550se (I think it was an se) and has the full Radeon video engine). I'm guessing that will make a difference on CPU usage.</p><p></p><p>Honestly, for video playback the 9200 should be fine as long as you aren't playing DX9 games. You won't notice a difference uless you check the CPU usage. </p><p></p><p>One concern is will the 9200 have the bandwidth to support playing HDTV. That we are trying to figure out now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jdiffend, post: 10159, member: 10910"] The 9200 hardware was designed to support DirectX8.1 and the software drivers add the additional DirectX 9 functionality. This should not be an issue unless you run a DirectX 9 game with all the features enabled. Turning on reflections, shadows, bump mapping and highest quality texture maps will turn a game into a slideshow... which is what I witnessed playing a DX9 game demo. The game was updating the picture about 1 frame per second... maybe a litte faster. My Radeon 9600se played full speed with everything on... I think the 9100 was about as fast when those settings I mentioned were off. The 5200 does support DX9 but they stripped a lot out. Check out the comparison chart for the GeforceFX cards on Nvidea's website. For about $10 more there's the Radeon 9550se (I think it was an se) and has the full Radeon video engine). I'm guessing that will make a difference on CPU usage. Honestly, for video playback the 9200 should be fine as long as you aren't playing DX9 games. You won't notice a difference uless you check the CPU usage. One concern is will the 9200 have the bandwidth to support playing HDTV. That we are trying to figure out now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
HTPC Projects
HTPC Projects
Lower-end HTPC project
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom