home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
News and Announcements
MediaPortal 1 Development - get involved!
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="infinite.loop" data-source="post: 822009" data-attributes="member: 10723"><p>I am sorry, but this makes perfect sense.</p><p></p><p>In the past we had one bug/rework/feature delaying an MP release for <strong><span style="color: Red">6+</span></strong> months! This means that quite a few developers where sitting on their hands because the problem was in an area they had no idea about<em> (i.e. SkinEngine)</em>, and due to the featurefreeze they could not work on anything else.</p><p></p><p>By working in branches, we can fully test each change <u>before</u> it is added to the master/release. This means a change which has not been fully tested and approved will not get into the master anymore.</p><p>Also developers can now work on their feature/bugfix/rework without being stalled by a featurefreeze that is active on the master.</p><p></p><p>Yes, testing is more work. But in the end the stability and the overall development workflow/speed of MP highly benefits from this development model.</p><p></p><p>Later on there will also be builds of the master <em>(pre-alpha 1.3.0, pre-beta 1.3.0, pre-rc 1.3.0)</em>.</p><p>But first the work in the branches must be finished before they can be merged with the master.</p><p></p><p>This is how we work.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="infinite.loop, post: 822009, member: 10723"] I am sorry, but this makes perfect sense. In the past we had one bug/rework/feature delaying an MP release for [B][COLOR="Red"]6+[/COLOR][/B] months! This means that quite a few developers where sitting on their hands because the problem was in an area they had no idea about[I] (i.e. SkinEngine)[/I], and due to the featurefreeze they could not work on anything else. By working in branches, we can fully test each change [U]before[/U] it is added to the master/release. This means a change which has not been fully tested and approved will not get into the master anymore. Also developers can now work on their feature/bugfix/rework without being stalled by a featurefreeze that is active on the master. Yes, testing is more work. But in the end the stability and the overall development workflow/speed of MP highly benefits from this development model. Later on there will also be builds of the master [I](pre-alpha 1.3.0, pre-beta 1.3.0, pre-rc 1.3.0)[/I]. But first the work in the branches must be finished before they can be merged with the master. This is how we work. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
News and Announcements
MediaPortal 1 Development - get involved!
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom