home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 637301" data-attributes="member: 10858"><p>Thanks for helping. I think having our own audio renderer of capable in things that Reclock is needed for few reasons:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> We don't know how long Slysoft / James is keeping with the development (they wont get any money out of reclock and developing it costs money. Also James has sounded already few times like he would stop developing Reclock any further...)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Reclock doesn't allow interaction between the EVR presenter and itself. This is important to get the most of the Owlsroost's EVR presenter implementation when it goes to the video playback quality.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"> Reclock doesn't work nicely with live tv. With our own audio renderer implementation we are at least in a bit better position to make the live tv to work with vsync position correction (this will of course be limited by the fact that live tv cannot buffer unlimited number of seconds if A/V is clocks are drifting greatly. Of cource you should throw such HW already into the garbage...)</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 637301, member: 10858"] Thanks for helping. I think having our own audio renderer of capable in things that Reclock is needed for few reasons: [list] [*] We don't know how long Slysoft / James is keeping with the development (they wont get any money out of reclock and developing it costs money. Also James has sounded already few times like he would stop developing Reclock any further...) [*] Reclock doesn't allow interaction between the EVR presenter and itself. This is important to get the most of the Owlsroost's EVR presenter implementation when it goes to the video playback quality. [*] Reclock doesn't work nicely with live tv. With our own audio renderer implementation we are at least in a bit better position to make the live tv to work with vsync position correction (this will of course be limited by the fact that live tv cannot buffer unlimited number of seconds if A/V is clocks are drifting greatly. Of cource you should throw such HW already into the garbage...) [/list] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom