Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 642927" data-attributes="member: 10858">Re: AW: Re: AW: MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback qualityThat is not bitstreaming anymore if the audio is molested by inserting data (duplicating packets or dropping). Even James from Slysoft agrees that it is not real bitstreaming. Bitstreaming can be considered only if the encoded data is transfered as 1:1 to the amplifier.What comes to the fact that it was not noticeable most likely iy was not done too often and it was just happening on cases were it was not causing any noticeable difference to audio. But what is point of running after bitstreaming if you aren't wanting real bitstreaming? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 642927, member: 10858"] [b]Re: AW: Re: AW: MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality[/b] That is not bitstreaming anymore if the audio is molested by inserting data (duplicating packets or dropping). Even James from Slysoft agrees that it is not real bitstreaming. Bitstreaming can be considered only if the encoded data is transfered as 1:1 to the amplifier. What comes to the fact that it was not noticeable most likely iy was not done too often and it was just happening on cases were it was not causing any noticeable difference to audio. But what is point of running after bitstreaming if you aren't wanting real bitstreaming? :) [/QUOTE]

Verification