home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 650894" data-attributes="member: 10858"><p><strong>Re: AW: MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Even if it would be non-default renderer people would use it (no matter if beta warnings are placed on visible places). It is the same with people using EVR renderer with Windows XP -> creates much work for the support side. So I don't think it is wise to add something that we know is causing already issues (audio renderer is far from ready to replace the MS directsound on "global" scale - for my personal use it works perfectly, there is no single issue spotted during the weeks I have been using it on my HTPC). </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Bias is only the fps vs. frame rate difference. But there is still that v-sync correction that the audio renderer is able to do. If you enable audio renderer and check with ! stats for the "adjustments done". If that is more than zero, then you would benefit from the audio renderer with live tv as well (it will "remove" the dropped frames on the long run that would be caused by slight drifting of the audio / video clocks.) If that value stays at zero then the other audio render is as good choice <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 650894, member: 10858"] [b]Re: AW: MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality[/b] Even if it would be non-default renderer people would use it (no matter if beta warnings are placed on visible places). It is the same with people using EVR renderer with Windows XP -> creates much work for the support side. So I don't think it is wise to add something that we know is causing already issues (audio renderer is far from ready to replace the MS directsound on "global" scale - for my personal use it works perfectly, there is no single issue spotted during the weeks I have been using it on my HTPC). Bias is only the fps vs. frame rate difference. But there is still that v-sync correction that the audio renderer is able to do. If you enable audio renderer and check with ! stats for the "adjustments done". If that is more than zero, then you would benefit from the audio renderer with live tv as well (it will "remove" the dropped frames on the long run that would be caused by slight drifting of the audio / video clocks.) If that value stays at zero then the other audio render is as good choice :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom