Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 651520" data-attributes="member: 10858">Re: AW: MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback qualityFor testing it would be good to have working combination <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Wont probably buy ATI since it has the flickering bug, so most likely use old NVIDIA GT9500 and then SPDIF from MB.But in any case these speculations start to go off topic. WASAPI is a standard that MS has developed for a reason. I really hope HW manufacturers notice that there is quite big issues with their drivers and they fix those. After all HTPC market is constantly growing.Summary about those bugs and workaround:1) ATI - quite easy to work around, no quality issues2) NVIDIA - requires more work (extra code for the polling based buffer filling), reduces glitch resistency</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tourettes, post: 651520, member: 10858"] [b]Re: AW: MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality[/b] For testing it would be good to have working combination :) Wont probably buy ATI since it has the flickering bug, so most likely use old NVIDIA GT9500 and then SPDIF from MB. But in any case these speculations start to go off topic. WASAPI is a standard that MS has developed for a reason. I really hope HW manufacturers notice that there is quite big issues with their drivers and they fix those. After all HTPC market is constantly growing. Summary about those bugs and workaround: 1) ATI - quite easy to work around, no quality issues 2) NVIDIA - requires more work (extra code for the polling based buffer filling), reduces glitch resistency [/QUOTE]

Verification