Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="red5goahead" data-source="post: 661050" data-attributes="member: 60852">I tried MPC MPA Decoder but it's not very different from ffdshow audio decoding about A/V synch.I've an Htpc with a Passmark cpu mark of about 1350 point (<a href="http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php" target="_blank">PassMark - CPU Benchmarks - List of Benchmarked CPUs</a>, 420^ position <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> ), CoreAvc 2.0 as h.264 video decoding. I have to set -15 Ms in ffdshow audio output to get a perfect a/v synch. With h264 from ffdshow video decoder the value must be different . So to get a good A/V is very important know and consider the complete filter chain because CoreAvc should be faster than ffdshow to decode video . (-15 ms mean the audio must be anticipated probably due video is decoded faster using CoreAvc)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="red5goahead, post: 661050, member: 60852"] I tried MPC MPA Decoder but it's not very different from ffdshow audio decoding about A/V synch. I've an Htpc with a Passmark cpu mark of about 1350 point ([url=http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php]PassMark - CPU Benchmarks - List of Benchmarked CPUs[/url], 420^ position :( ), CoreAvc 2.0 as h.264 video decoding. I have to set -15 Ms in ffdshow audio output to get a perfect a/v synch. With h264 from ffdshow video decoder the value must be different . So to get a good A/V is very important know and consider the complete filter chain because CoreAvc should be faster than ffdshow to decode video . (-15 ms mean the audio must be anticipated probably due video is decoded faster using CoreAvc) [/QUOTE]

Verification