home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="davidf" data-source="post: 661526" data-attributes="member: 19484"><p>The speed up will probably be significant percentagewise but will be small in real time i.e. your code execution time will be small anyway. One advantage it will give you is that there will be no error introduced due to floating point maths. After seeing the variation over your 100 second sample I would probably up the 10 minute sample limit to see when it becomes stable, it seems to have a range 0.0004 after 100 seconds. You didn't use a max sample time but I didn't want to overflow the figure (but I suspect you'd need a few years of samples to do that 2^64 is quite big even in nano seconds)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="davidf, post: 661526, member: 19484"] The speed up will probably be significant percentagewise but will be small in real time i.e. your code execution time will be small anyway. One advantage it will give you is that there will be no error introduced due to floating point maths. After seeing the variation over your 100 second sample I would probably up the 10 minute sample limit to see when it becomes stable, it seems to have a range 0.0004 after 100 seconds. You didn't use a max sample time but I didn't want to overflow the figure (but I suspect you'd need a few years of samples to do that 2^64 is quite big even in nano seconds) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Development
General Development (no feature request here!)
MediaPortal Audio renderer - better video playback quality
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom