home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
Popular Plugins
Graveyard
MediaSlayer
MediaSlayer - CD and DVD HD ripping tool
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joz" data-source="post: 351390" data-attributes="member: 70244"><p>You're comparing an MPEG4 format to MPEG2. </p><p>Look better, you'll see compression in MPEG4. MPEG2 is also specifically designed to look better on analog screens.</p><p></p><p>So yes there are most certainly differences in quality.</p><p>IMGBURN just makes a 1:1 copy to the HD (so quality is exact same as original). MEncoder re-encodes the entire movie.</p><p>Therefore IMGBurn is faster too cause it doesn't have to re-encode stuff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joz, post: 351390, member: 70244"] You're comparing an MPEG4 format to MPEG2. Look better, you'll see compression in MPEG4. MPEG2 is also specifically designed to look better on analog screens. So yes there are most certainly differences in quality. IMGBURN just makes a 1:1 copy to the HD (so quality is exact same as original). MEncoder re-encodes the entire movie. Therefore IMGBurn is faster too cause it doesn't have to re-encode stuff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
Popular Plugins
Graveyard
MediaSlayer
MediaSlayer - CD and DVD HD ripping tool
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
