home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
MediaWebPortal --- 1.1.1 --- 12-04-2010
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joz" data-source="post: 597935" data-attributes="member: 70244"><p><strong>Re: MediaWebPortal --- beta3 --- 23-03-2010</strong></p><p></p><p>Hey Poko, </p><p></p><p>I'm glad you like it! Mentioned it before but I think it's now stable enough to have additional features implemented, so if you think of any... Here's what I thought of myself so far;</p><p></p><p>1) Implement a configurable waiting duration on numeric navigation so multiple numbers can be received (I guess defaulting to a second or something, then what it has received so far will be triggered, if exists). The numbers you entered will be visible somewhere.</p><p></p><p>2) Implement google search. Make it as accessible as possible, maybe implement T9 support? Haven't found any T9 Javascript/JQuery plugins so I'd have to get there from scratch but I think it won't be too difficult. Haven't done that much with those google search boxes, dunno if T9 is possible, should be.</p><p></p><p>3) Add an RSS ticker somewhere maybe if I can make it look half decent. Already have one on my homepage but that´s been there for ages and the JS behind it sucks a bit hard so I guess looking for something new first. the HTML <marquee> tag's just too ugly animation wise. Also would have to figure out some AJAX to have a generic way to get and parse a feed, could be a bit complicated as well.</p><p></p><p>If no one else comes up with something that I like more then I'm gonna go with number one for now.</p><p></p><p>p.s.</p><p>Performance is no big issue for me since my boxes are powered enough but if there are people that use this on low end machines and have issues I can look into it. I feel till now it's performing really quite good for javascript so I hope/think this is not an issue yet.</p><p>Could always consider releasing a lite version if needed.</p><p></p><p>p.s.2</p><p>Javascript source (unpacked) is available only by PM request and only when considering contribution to the project (so when applying by PM you can explain yourself). Which reminds me of looking for some GNU licensing stuff.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joz, post: 597935, member: 70244"] [b]Re: MediaWebPortal --- beta3 --- 23-03-2010[/b] Hey Poko, I'm glad you like it! Mentioned it before but I think it's now stable enough to have additional features implemented, so if you think of any... Here's what I thought of myself so far; 1) Implement a configurable waiting duration on numeric navigation so multiple numbers can be received (I guess defaulting to a second or something, then what it has received so far will be triggered, if exists). The numbers you entered will be visible somewhere. 2) Implement google search. Make it as accessible as possible, maybe implement T9 support? Haven't found any T9 Javascript/JQuery plugins so I'd have to get there from scratch but I think it won't be too difficult. Haven't done that much with those google search boxes, dunno if T9 is possible, should be. 3) Add an RSS ticker somewhere maybe if I can make it look half decent. Already have one on my homepage but that´s been there for ages and the JS behind it sucks a bit hard so I guess looking for something new first. the HTML <marquee> tag's just too ugly animation wise. Also would have to figure out some AJAX to have a generic way to get and parse a feed, could be a bit complicated as well. If no one else comes up with something that I like more then I'm gonna go with number one for now. p.s. Performance is no big issue for me since my boxes are powered enough but if there are people that use this on low end machines and have issues I can look into it. I feel till now it's performing really quite good for javascript so I hope/think this is not an issue yet. Could always consider releasing a lite version if needed. p.s.2 Javascript source (unpacked) is available only by PM request and only when considering contribution to the project (so when applying by PM you can explain yourself). Which reminds me of looking for some GNU licensing stuff. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
OffTopic
MediaWebPortal --- 1.1.1 --- 12-04-2010
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom