Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Benoire" data-source="post: 1040743" data-attributes="member: 121281">Hey Owlsroost, thanks for the reply <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Would there be any benefit in simply forcing MediaPortal down a single filter route (such as LAV)?&nbsp; Ignoring the obvious lack of choice and potential conflicts, would this allow refinement of many of the playback options, or am I simplifying it too much?Honestly, I'd love to give this programming malarkey ago, unfortunately I've tried and I simply cannot get my head around C# at all... I'm a Civil Engineer and logic comes naturally to me but hell the way the code is referenced really has me confused!I'd love to see further improvements to FFWD/RWD but understand that the want of one is out weighed by the want of the many (etc. etc.).Anywho, as I say to mm, keep up the damn fine work!</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Benoire, post: 1040743, member: 121281"] Hey Owlsroost, thanks for the reply :-) Would there be any benefit in simply forcing MediaPortal down a single filter route (such as LAV)? Ignoring the obvious lack of choice and potential conflicts, would this allow refinement of many of the playback options, or am I simplifying it too much? Honestly, I'd love to give this programming malarkey ago, unfortunately I've tried and I simply cannot get my head around C# at all... I'm a Civil Engineer and logic comes naturally to me but hell the way the code is referenced really has me confused! I'd love to see further improvements to FFWD/RWD but understand that the want of one is out weighed by the want of the many (etc. etc.). Anywho, as I say to mm, keep up the damn fine work! [/QUOTE]

Verification