Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Jong" data-source="post: 609343" data-attributes="member: 104040">Possibly, but it seems there are already two options available:- Use EVR Sync &quot;present at nearest&quot; which works even with Reclock. And because Reclock is adapting playback speeds (assuming they are not so far out that is not possible of course) there should be very little drift and maybe (depending on the method for targeting vsync) no dropped frames in a typical movie. This assumes that a full frame of drift would be needed to cause a dropped/repeated frame regardless of the initial raster offset, but that should be possible. One thing I am not sure of is how well this works when using non-exact multiple adaptation, e.g Reclock automatically recognises 24fps@60Hz, 23.976Hz@59.94Hz and allows 3:2 pulldown. It will even speed up 23.976fps to 24fps for display @60Hz. It will also automatically display 29.97 or 30fps material @50Hz (the former sped up to 30fps), which also has a regular if slightly unusual cadence (better than slowing down or speeding up, or running 29.97fps at its original speed, which leads to irregular cadence and more irritating judder). Reclock vsync control can still achieve and then hold its target with these, not sure if &quot;present at nearest&quot; will cope (just never tested).- Allow an advanced option to turn off all vsync correction as per EVR Sync, which would allow people using Reclock to let Reclock do everything, including vsync (with Aero ON), as it seems was possible until recently.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Jong, post: 609343, member: 104040"] Possibly, but it seems there are already two options available: - Use EVR Sync "present at nearest" which works even with Reclock. And because Reclock is adapting playback speeds (assuming they are not so far out that is not possible of course) there should be very little drift and maybe (depending on the method for targeting vsync) no dropped frames in a typical movie. This assumes that a full frame of drift would be needed to cause a dropped/repeated frame regardless of the initial raster offset, but that should be possible. One thing I am not sure of is how well this works when using non-exact multiple adaptation, e.g Reclock automatically recognises 24fps@60Hz, 23.976Hz@59.94Hz and allows 3:2 pulldown. It will even speed up 23.976fps to 24fps for display @60Hz. It will also automatically display 29.97 or 30fps material @50Hz (the former sped up to 30fps), which also has a regular if slightly unusual cadence (better than slowing down or speeding up, or running 29.97fps at its original speed, which leads to irregular cadence and more irritating judder). Reclock vsync control can still achieve and then hold its target with these, not sure if "present at nearest" will cope (just never tested). - Allow an advanced option to turn off all vsync correction as per EVR Sync, which would allow people using Reclock to let Reclock do everything, including vsync (with Aero ON), as it seems was possible until recently. [/QUOTE]

Verification