Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="doveman" data-source="post: 895111" data-attributes="member: 67412">Oh well. I thought Audacity was quite well respected <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />&nbsp;I used to use Cool Edit (the pre-Adobe version) and loved it. I haven't used it recently as I haven't had time to do any audio stuff. Soundforge as well I used to use and recall it being pretty good. I'm not sure what &quot;noteworthy improvement&quot; you need from a WAV Editor. Generally good software ends up being trash because developers can't recognise it already does the job well and they're eager to &quot;improve&quot; it.&nbsp;I know there's some good DAW software (I'm looking at Presonus Studio One) but it's daft to suggest that WAV Editors are redundant because of the rise of MP3. If I need to edit/create/mangle a sample, or even trim a recording before converting it to MP3, then I need a WAV Editor.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="doveman, post: 895111, member: 67412"] Oh well. I thought Audacity was quite well respected ;) I used to use Cool Edit (the pre-Adobe version) and loved it. I haven't used it recently as I haven't had time to do any audio stuff. Soundforge as well I used to use and recall it being pretty good. I'm not sure what "noteworthy improvement" you need from a WAV Editor. Generally good software ends up being trash because developers can't recognise it already does the job well and they're eager to "improve" it. I know there's some good DAW software (I'm looking at Presonus Studio One) but it's daft to suggest that WAV Editors are redundant because of the rise of MP3. If I need to edit/create/mangle a sample, or even trim a recording before converting it to MP3, then I need a WAV Editor. [/QUOTE]

Verification