home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
MP1 Upgrade to 1.17 causes playback of recordings to stop
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1230881" data-attributes="member: 82144"><p>[USER=117536]@RonD[/USER]</p><p></p><p>You're assuming ATSC digital terrestrial (maybe valid, I'm not sure) whereas my numbers are actual worst case (clear QAM [cable] 256 QAM).</p><p></p><p>Please refer to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAM_(television)" target="_blank">QAM (television) - Wikipedia</a></p><p></p><p>ATSC 8 VSB (digital terrestrial, over-the-air, received with an aerial/antenna) is 19.3926 Mbps [usable] as you say.</p><p>Clear QAM 64 QAM (unencrypted digital cable, received with a cable connection) is 30.342 Mbps (26.97035 usable).</p><p>Clear QAM 256 QAM (unencrypted digital cable, received with a cable connection) is 42.8843 Mbps (38.81070 usable).</p><p></p><p>Either way:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">Wireless and powerline connections are not suitable due to either or both latency and bandwidth limitation issues.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">A wired 100 Mbps connection is insufficient for 4 clear QAM streams and borderline for 4 ATSC streams. In the ATSC case there's only ~20 Mbps for other network traffic (internet etc.). I agree with your assessment that this would be far from ideal.</li> </ol><p>Hence my recommendation for a gigabit/1000 Mbps connection.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1230881, member: 82144"] [USER=117536]@RonD[/USER] You're assuming ATSC digital terrestrial (maybe valid, I'm not sure) whereas my numbers are actual worst case (clear QAM [cable] 256 QAM). Please refer to [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAM_(television)"]QAM (television) - Wikipedia[/URL] ATSC 8 VSB (digital terrestrial, over-the-air, received with an aerial/antenna) is 19.3926 Mbps [usable] as you say. Clear QAM 64 QAM (unencrypted digital cable, received with a cable connection) is 30.342 Mbps (26.97035 usable). Clear QAM 256 QAM (unencrypted digital cable, received with a cable connection) is 42.8843 Mbps (38.81070 usable). Either way: [LIST=1] [*]Wireless and powerline connections are not suitable due to either or both latency and bandwidth limitation issues. [*]A wired 100 Mbps connection is insufficient for 4 clear QAM streams and borderline for 4 ATSC streams. In the ATSC case there's only ~20 Mbps for other network traffic (internet etc.). I agree with your assessment that this would be far from ideal. [/LIST] Hence my recommendation for a gigabit/1000 Mbps connection. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
Newcomers Forum
MP1 Upgrade to 1.17 causes playback of recordings to stop
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom